Premium
Dynamics and Crystallization in Polydimethylsiloxane Nanocomposites
Author(s) -
Beigbeder Alexandre,
Bruzaud Stéphane,
Spěváček Jiri,
Brus Jiri,
Grohens Yves
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
macromolecular symposia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.257
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1521-3900
pISSN - 1022-1360
DOI - 10.1002/masy.200550429
Subject(s) - nanocomposite , polydimethylsiloxane , materials science , crystallization , differential scanning calorimetry , intercalation (chemistry) , polymerization , chemical engineering , polymer , grafting , polymer chemistry , composite material , chemistry , organic chemistry , thermodynamics , physics , engineering
Several routes were used to achieve silicon nanocomposites. The first and second one are the melt intercalation of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), which is a mechanical blending of the polymer in the molten state with the untreated inorganic filler or intercalated nanoparticles. The last one is an in situ polymerization, which previously requires the intercalation of hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane (D 3 ) followed by a subsequent polymerization step. We used synthetic mineral oxide HTiNbO 5 as nanofiller. These systems were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and solid state NMR in order to better understand the relation between the nanocomposites dynamics, and crystallisation. The efficiency of grafting reactions was studied by 29 Si CP/MAS NMR. The nature of the interfacial interactions seems to play the major role. Indeed, the nanocomposites 1 and 2 for which only physical interactions are expected do not exhibit any T g deviation whereas the nanocomposite 3, for which chemical grafting is achieved, increases strongly the T g . Crystallization is more sensitive to density and strength of interfacial interactions which are maximum for the pristine filler.