Premium
Jimmy John's Workers Lawfully Terminated for Disloyalty
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
management report for nonunion organizations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1530-8286
pISSN - 0745-4880
DOI - 10.1002/mare.30313
Subject(s) - franchise , appeal , law , political science , business , business administration
There has been a new ruling in the case of the Minneapolis‐area Jimmy John's workers who tried to unionize, failed, and then were fired after they engaged in a campaign that heavily implied that sandwiches bought from Jimmy John's could be infected with disease. Franchise owner MikLin argued that this campaign was so disloyal as to lose the protection of federal labor law. The National Labor Relations Board and a three‐judge panel from the 8th Circuit Appeals Court disagreed, finding that the posters and message about contaminated food were permissible. The employer continued to appeal and now has been vindicated by a new ruling from the 8th Circuit en banc that agrees with the franchise owner that the firings for disloyalty were lawful.