z-logo
Premium
Understanding and Optimizing the SMX Static Mixer
Author(s) -
Singh Mrityunjay K.,
Anderson Patrick D.,
Meijer Han E. H.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
macromolecular rapid communications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.348
H-Index - 154
eISSN - 1521-3927
pISSN - 1022-1336
DOI - 10.1002/marc.200800710
Subject(s) - optimal design , series (stratigraphy) , image (mathematics) , channel (broadcasting) , energy (signal processing) , materials science , vortex , compact space , physics , analytical chemistry (journal) , mathematics , combinatorics , optics , chemistry , mathematical analysis , mechanics , computer science , chromatography , statistics , quantum mechanics , telecommunications , paleontology , artificial intelligence , biology
Using the Mapping Method different designs of SMX motionless mixers are analyzed and optimized. The three design parameters that constitute a specific SMX design are: The number of cross‐bars over the width of channel, N x , the number of parallel cross‐bars per element, N p , and the angle between opposite cross‐bars θ . Optimizing N x , somewhat surprisingly reveals that in the standard design with N p  = 3, N x  = 6 is the optimum using both energy efficiency as well as compactness as criteria. Increasing N x results in under‐stretching and decreasing N x leads to over‐stretching of the interface. Increasing N p makes interfacial stretching more effective by co‐operating vortices. Comparing realized to optimal stretching, we find the optimum series for all possible SMX( n ) designs to obey the universal design rule N p  = (2/3) N x −1, for N x  = 3, 6, 9, 12, ….

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom