Premium
How Do You Know That? The Epistemology of Consumer Health Decision Making under Conditions of Risk–Benefit Conflict
Author(s) -
Rogers Zoe F.,
Gould Stephen J.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
psychology and marketing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.035
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1520-6793
pISSN - 0742-6046
DOI - 10.1002/mar.20791
Subject(s) - psychology , mediation , product (mathematics) , risk perception , perception , social psychology , health risk , moderated mediation , elaboration likelihood model , frame (networking) , epistemology , sociology , computer science , medicine , persuasion , social science , telecommunications , philosophy , geometry , mathematics , environmental health , neuroscience
Consumers are confronted with conflicting health information in the form of risks and benefits on a regular basis. One way to understand how different consumers handle the challenge of this conflicting information is by considering consumers’ epistemic beliefs, that is, their beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. In two studies, it is shown that both measured and manipulated epistemic beliefs similarly influence consumer assessments of conflicting risk–benefit health information through two epistemic dimensions—texture (simple or complex) and variability (stable or dynamic). Moderated mediation findings indicate that those who were presented risk–benefit information about health‐related products and diets that were perceived as being less (more) familiar had a lower (greater) likelihood of using the product or following the diet through the mediators of thinking about both the risks and the benefits involved, for several of the moderating variability and texture epistemic beliefs. The contribution of this research is to show how epistemic beliefs can differentially frame and inform consumer perceptions and evaluations of conflicted health information.