z-logo
Premium
Sequential Betting Behavior: A Test of Asymmetric Inconsistencies in Group Decision Making
Author(s) -
Islam Gazi,
Claro Danny P.,
Andrade Eduardo B.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
psychology and marketing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.035
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1520-6793
pISSN - 0742-6046
DOI - 10.1002/mar.20681
Subject(s) - psychology , outcome (game theory) , task (project management) , test (biology) , social psychology , group decision making , microeconomics , economics , paleontology , management , biology
Previous research has shown that individual decision makers tend to bet more than initially planned after experiencing a loss but not after a gain. This research tests whether groups in consensus decision‐making contexts also demonstrate similar asymmetric inconsistencies. Two experiments, one at the individual level and one with three‐person groups, were carried out based on a gambling‐type betting task. Although individuals planned more conservatively than groups regarding their betting behavior after the first outcome, both individuals and groups misestimated their own betting behavior after losses but not after gains. Negative, but not positive, emotional reactions to previous decision outcomes were also misestimated, leading to incorrect predictions of future behavior. Implications for theory and future research are discussed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here