Premium
Reexamining and extending the dual mediation hypothesis in an on‐line advertising context
Author(s) -
Karson Eric J.,
Fisher Robert J.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
psychology and marketing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.035
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1520-6793
pISSN - 0742-6046
DOI - 10.1002/mar.20062
Subject(s) - perspective (graphical) , context (archaeology) , psychology , advertising , web site , mediation , transactional leadership , path analysis (statistics) , dual (grammatical number) , social psychology , marketing , the internet , world wide web , sociology , computer science , business , paleontology , social science , art , literature , artificial intelligence , machine learning , biology
Abstract The relationship between attitude toward the advertisement (A ad ) and intentions to buy (I b ) is a controversial one. The present research examines the potential for a direct relationship between A ad and I b within an on‐line advertising context, substituting A site (attitude toward the Web site) for A ad . The article replicates previous findings with respect to the four competing A ad models they tested. The article then predicts and finds a significant A site → I b path based on an opportunity and motivation perspective. In terms of opportunity, Web sites contain nonproduct information that is independent of traditional measures of brand attitude (A b ), such as security, ease of use, transactional capabilities, which are likely to affect I b . Further, on‐line consumers are motivated to process this information when they visit a Web site because they cannot directly examine the products they are considering. Evidence for the opportunity and motivation perspective is provided by the decomposition of A site into its claim and non‐claim components and assessment of the A site → I b path across levels of motivation to process. Implications for on‐line advertisers are discussed. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.