z-logo
Premium
Dispersion and Property Enhancements in Polyolefin/Soy Flour Biocomposites Prepared via Melt Extrusion Followed by Solid‐State Shear Pulverization
Author(s) -
Iyer Krishnan A.,
Torkelson John M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
macromolecular materials and engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.913
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1439-2054
pISSN - 1438-7492
DOI - 10.1002/mame.201500019
Subject(s) - polyolefin , materials science , composite material , low density polyethylene , extrusion , polypropylene , polyethylene , crystallization , ultimate tensile strength , polymer , dispersion (optics) , chemical engineering , physics , optics , layer (electronics) , engineering
Biocomposites of low‐density polyethylene (LDPE) and polypropylene (PP) with 5–40 wt% soy flour (SF) are produced by two‐step single‐screw extrusion (SSE) followed by solid‐state shear pulverization (SSSP). The SSE‐SSSP approach overcomes limitations with melt mixing, e.g poor SF dispersion and degradation, and limitations with single‐step SSSP. Microscopy shows that SF is well dispersed in SSE‐SSSP composites but agglomerated and degraded in melt‐mixed composites. The SSE‐SSSP composites exhibit major improvements in Young's modulus relative to neat polymer, including 74 and 43% increases in 80/20 wt% LDPE/SF and 95/5 wt% PP/SF composites, respectively. Relative to neat polymer, SSE‐SSSP composites exhibit the largest improvements in Young's modulus and best tensile strengths reported for polyolefin/SF composites. Crystallization and viscosity are only slightly affected by SF in the composites. At 20% and higher mass loss, char can result in greater thermo‐oxidative stability of 80/20 wt% polyolefin/SF composites relative to neat polymer.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here