z-logo
Premium
The Suszko operator relative to truth‐equational logics
Author(s) -
Albuquerque Hugo
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
mathematical logic quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.473
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1521-3870
pISSN - 0942-5616
DOI - 10.1002/malq.202000034
Subject(s) - mathematics , operator (biology) , equational logic , representation (politics) , class (philosophy) , discrete mathematics , algebra over a field , pure mathematics , computer science , programming language , artificial intelligence , rewriting , biochemistry , chemistry , repressor , gene , politics , transcription factor , political science , law
This note presents some new results from [1] about the Suszko operator and truth‐equational logics, following the works of Czelakowski [11] and Raftery [17]. It is proved that the Suszko operator relative to a truth‐equational logic S preserves suprema and commutes with endomorphisms. Together with injectivity, proved by Raftery in [17], the Suszko operator relative to a truth‐equational logic is a structural representation, as defined in [15]. Furthermore, if Alg ( S ) is a quasivariety, then the Suszko operator relative to a truth‐equational logic is continuous. Finally, it is proved that truth is equationally definable in the classLMod Su ( S )if and only if Alg ( S ) is a τ∞ ‐algebraic semantics for S and the Suszko operatorΩ ∼ S Fm : Th S → Co Alg ( S ) Fm preserves suprema and commutes with substitutions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom