Premium
Definable types in algebraically closed valued fields
Author(s) -
Cubides Kovacsics Pablo,
Delon Françoise
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
mathematical logic quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.473
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1521-3870
pISSN - 0942-5616
DOI - 10.1002/malq.201400039
Subject(s) - algebraically closed field , counterexample , mathematics , type (biology) , property (philosophy) , statement (logic) , field (mathematics) , pure mathematics , discrete mathematics , ecology , philosophy , epistemology , political science , law , biology
In [15][D. Marker, 1994], Marker and Steinhorn characterized models M ≺ N of an o‐minimal theory such that all types over M realized in N are definable. In this article we characterize pairs of algebraically closed valued fields satisfying the same property. In o‐minimal theories, a pair of models M ≺ N for which all 1‐types over M realized in N are definable has already the desired property. Although it is true that if M is an algebraically closed valued field such that all 1‐types over M are definable then all types over M are definable, we build a counterexample for the relative statement, i.e., we show for any n ≥ 1 that there is a pair M ≺ N of algebraically closed valued fields such that all n ‐types over M realized in N are definable but there is an n + 1 ‐type over M realized in N which is not definable.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom