z-logo
Premium
Collapsing functions
Author(s) -
Schimmerling Ernest,
Velickovic Boban
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
mathematical logic quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.473
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1521-3870
pISSN - 0942-5616
DOI - 10.1002/malq.200310069
Subject(s) - mathematics , forcing (mathematics) , ideal (ethics) , combinatorics , function (biology) , corollary , embedding , limit (mathematics) , tower , mathematical analysis , philosophy , computer science , civil engineering , epistemology , evolutionary biology , artificial intelligence , engineering , biology
We define what it means for a function on ω 1 to be a collapsing function for λ and show that if there exists a collapsing function for (2   ω   1) + , then there is no precipitous ideal on ω 1 . We show that a collapsing function for ω 2 can be added by forcing. We define what it means to be a weakly ω 1 ‐Erdös cardinal and show that in L [ E ], there is a collapsing function for λ iff λ is less than the least weakly ω 1 ‐Erdös cardinal. As a corollary to our results and a theorem of Neeman, the existence of a Woodin limit of Woodin cardinals does not imply the existence of precipitous ideals on ω 1 . We also show that the following statements hold in L [ E ]. The least cardinal λ with the Chang property ( λ, ω 1 ) ↠ ( ω 1 , ω ) is equal to the least ω 1 ‐Erdös cardinal. In particular, if j is a generic elementary embedding that arises from non‐stationary tower forcing up to a Woodin cardinal, then the minimum possible value of j ( ω 1 ) is the least ω 1 ‐Erdös cardinal. (© 2003 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom