Premium
New stainless steels for sea‐water applications. Part II: Comparison of corrosion and mechanical properties of laboratory and commercial ELI ferritic and superaustenitic stainless steels
Author(s) -
Sinigaglia D.,
Taccani G.,
Vicentini B.,
Rondelli G.,
Galelli L.
Publication year - 1982
Publication title -
materials and corrosion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.487
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1521-4176
pISSN - 0947-5117
DOI - 10.1002/maco.19820331103
Subject(s) - metallurgy , materials science , intergranular corrosion , corrosion , crevice corrosion , austenitic stainless steel , austenite , chromium , pitting corrosion , microstructure
This paper represents a follow‐up to the first part of the work on new stainless steels for sea‐water service. Four laboratory ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) ferritic stainless steels (types 25 Cr‐4 Ni‐4 Mo), two commercial ELI ferritic stainless steels (types 25 Cr‐4 Ni‐4 MoTi and 26 Cr‐2.5 Ni‐3 MoTi) and two highly alloyed austenitic stainless steels (types 20 Cr‐25 Ni‐4.5 MoCu and 20 Cr‐18 Ni‐6 MoN) have been investigated. With a view to establish the performance of these new alloys in chloride containing environments, systematic electrochemical and laboratory exposure tests have been carried out to define how various factors affect its susceptibility to intergranular, pitting, crevice and stress corrosion. Tension tests were also performed. From the comparison of the localized corrosion resistance and mechanical properties it has been concluded that the laboratory Ti, Ti + Nb or Nb stabilized ELI ferritic stainless steels and the commercial type 25 Cr‐4 Ni‐4 MoTi of analogous composition could be a valuable alternative to the more expensive highly alloyed stainless steel type 20 Cr‐25 Ni‐4.5 MoCu which has been especially developed and already used for industrial sea‐water applications.