Premium
Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Left Lateral Sectionectomy in Pediatric Transplantation: A Propensity Score Analysis on 220 Consecutive Patients
Author(s) -
Broering Dieter C.,
Elsheikh Yasser,
Shagrani Mohammed,
Abaalkhail Faisal,
Troisi Roberto I.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
liver transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.814
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1527-6473
pISSN - 1527-6465
DOI - 10.1002/lt.25043
Subject(s) - medicine , living donor liver transplantation , propensity score matching , surgery , single center , liver transplantation , transplantation , retrospective cohort study , blood loss
Left lateral sectionectomy for donor hepatectomy is a well‐established alternative to deceased donor pediatric liver transplantation. However, very little is available on the laparoscopic approach (laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy [L‐LLS]). With the aim to assess safety, reproducibility under proctorship, and outcomes following living donor liver transplantation in children, a comparative single‐center series using propensity score matching (PSM) to evaluate open left lateral sectionectomy (O‐LLS) versus L‐LLS was carried out in a relatively short time period in a high‐volume pediatric transplant center. A retrospective, observational, single‐center, PSM study was conducted on 220 consecutive living donor hepatectomies from January 2011 to April 2017. The variables considered for PSM were as follows: year of operation, recipient age, indication for transplant, recipient weight, donor sex, donor age, and donor body mass index. After matching, 72 O‐LLSs were fit to be compared with 72 L‐LLSs. Operative time and warm ischemia time were significantly longer in L‐LLSs, whereas blood loss and overall donor complication rates were significantly lower. Postoperative day 1 and 4 pain scores were significantly less in the L‐LLS group ( P = 0.015 and 0.003, respectively). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in L‐LLS (4.6 versus 4.1 days; P = 0.014). Overall donor biliary complications were 9 (12.5%) and 1 (1.4%) for O‐LLS and L‐LLS ( P = 0.022), respectively. Vascular complications occurred in 3 (4.2%) children without graft loss in the laparoscopic group. The 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year overall patient survival rates were 98.5%, 90.9%, and 90.9% in the O‐LLS group and in the L‐LLS group 94.3%, 92.7%, and 86.8% ( P = 0.28). In conclusion, L‐LLS for donor hepatectomy is a safe and reproducible technique yielding better donor perioperative outcomes with respect to the conventional approach with similar recipient outcomes.