z-logo
Premium
Standardized hybrid living donor hemihepatectomy in adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation
Author(s) -
Eguchi Susumu,
Soyama Akihiko,
Hara Takanobu,
Natsuda Koji,
Okada Satomi,
Hamada Takashi,
Kosaka Taiichiro,
Ono Shinichiro,
Adachi Tomohiko,
Hidaka Masaaki,
Takatsuki Mitsuhisa
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
liver transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.814
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1527-6473
pISSN - 1527-6465
DOI - 10.1002/lt.24990
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , laparotomy , liver transplantation , living donor liver transplantation , hepatectomy , laparoscopy , incidence (geometry) , blood loss , significant difference , transplantation , resection , physics , optics
The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of the most updated version and largest group of our standardized hybrid (laparoscopic mobilization and hepatectomy through midline incision) living donor (LD) hemihepatectomy compared with those from a conventional laparotomy in adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Of 237 adult‐to‐adult LDLTs from August 1997 to March 2017, 110 LDs underwent the hybrid procedure. Preoperative and operative factors were analyzed and compared with conventional laparotomy (n = 126). The median duration of laparoscopic usage was 26 minutes in the hybrid group. Although there was improvement in applying this procedure over time from the beginning of the series of cases studied, blood loss and operative duration were still smaller and shorter in the hybrid group. There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of postoperative complications greater than or equal to Clavien‐Dindo class III. There was no difference in recipient outcome between the groups. Our standardized procedure of hybrid LD hepatectomy is applicable and safe for all types of LD hepatectomies, and it enables the benefit of both the laparoscopic and the open approach in a transplant center without a laparoscopic expert. Liver Transplantation 24 363–368 2018 AASLD.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here