z-logo
Premium
Prerecovery liver biopsy in the brain‐dead donor: A case‐control study of logistics, safety, precision, and utility
Author(s) -
Oliver Joseph Benton,
Peters Stephen,
Bongu Advaith,
Beidas AbdelKareem,
Dikdan George,
Brown Lloyd,
Koneru Baburao
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
liver transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.814
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1527-6473
pISSN - 1527-6465
DOI - 10.1002/lt.23786
Subject(s) - medicine , steatosis , liver transplantation , biopsy , liver biopsy , fibrosis , gastroenterology , surgery , transplantation
Prerecovery liver biopsy (PLB) can potentially to decrease futile recovery and increase utilization of marginal brain‐dead donor (BDD) livers. A case‐control study was conducted to examine the logistics, safety, histological precision, and liver utilization associated with PLB in BDDs. Twenty‐three cases between January 2008 and January 2013 were compared to 2 groups: 48 sequential and 69 clinically matched controls. Compared to the sequential controls, the cases were older (53 versus 46 years), heavier (30.2 versus 25.8 kg/m 2 ), had higher prevalences of hypertension (78.3% versus 44.7%) and alcohol use (56.5% versus 23.4%), and a lower United Network for Organ Sharing expected organ yield (0.73 versus 0.81 livers/donor; P  < 0.05 for all). Baseline characteristics were similar between cases and clinical controls. Donor management time was longer for the cases (22.4 hours) versus sequential controls (16.5 hours, P  = 0.01) and clinical controls (15.9 hours, P  = 0.01). Complications for cases (8.7%) were not different from either group of controls (18.8% for sequential controls, P  = 0.46; 17.4% for clinical controls, P  = 0.50). The agreement between the donor hospital and study pathologists was substantial regarding evaluation of steatosis (κ = 0.623) and fibrosis (κ = 0.627) and moderate regarding inflammation (κ = 0.495). The proportions of livers that were transplanted were similar for the cases and the clinical controls (60.9% versus 59.4%). In contrast, the proportion of donors for whom liver recovery was not attempted was higher (30.4% versus 8.7%), and the proportion of attempted liver recoveries that did not result in transplantation was lower (8.7% versus 31.9%). These differences were significant at P  = 0.009. Overall, PLB is logistically feasible with only a minimal delay and is safe, its interpretation at donor hospitals is reproducible, and it appears to decrease futile liver recovery. Liver Transpl 20:237‐244, 2014 . © 2013 AASLD.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom