z-logo
Premium
Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in Adolescents with stable liver transplants: Comparative pharmacokinetics and 1‐year follow‐up
Author(s) -
CarcasSansuán Antonio J.,
Hierro Loreto,
AlmeidaPaulo Gonzalo N.,
Frauca Esteban,
Tong Hoi Yan,
Díaz Carmen,
Piñana Enrique,
FríasIniesta Jesús,
Jara Paloma
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
liver transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.814
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1527-6473
pISSN - 1527-6465
DOI - 10.1002/lt.23711
Subject(s) - medicine , pharmacokinetics , tacrolimus , confidence interval , cmax , bioavailability , liver transplantation , urology , creatinine , pharmacology , transplantation
The recommended dose of Advagraf for conversion from Prograf is considered to be 1:1 on a milligram basis. However, the long‐term equivalence of Prograf and Advagraf has been questioned. The relative bioavailability of Advagraf and Prograf was evaluated in a single‐center, open‐label study of Prograf‐to‐Advagraf conversion in 20 patients, ranging in age from 12 to 18 years, who had a stable liver transplant and were receiving Prograf. After the supervised administration of Prograf for 7 days, the patients were converted to Advagraf. On days 7 and 14, serial blood samples were obtained for tacrolimus determinations. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with a noncompartmental approach, and the relative bioavailability of both formulations was calculated according to standard statistical methods. Polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 3A5 (rs776746), adenosine triphosphate–binding cassette B1 (rs1045642), POR*28 (rs1057868), and POR (rs2868177) were determined with standard methods. The clinical and analytical data from a 1‐year follow‐up period were collected for all patients 30, 90, 180, and 360 days after conversion. The mean ratios for C max and AUC 0‐24 were 96.9 (90% confidence interval = 85.37‐110.19) and 100.1 (90% confidence interval = 90.8‐112.1), respectively. No relationship was found between the patients' genotypes and the pharmacokinetic tacrolimus values. During the follow‐up, biochemical parameters (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, bilirubin, cystatin C, and creatinine) did not change significantly; 3 patients presented with relevant clinical events, but no event was considered to be related to tacrolimus. A decrease in tacrolimus blood levels and an increase in dose/level ratios were observed 3 and 6 months after conversion, but they returned to basal levels by month 12. In conclusion, conversion from Prograf to Advagraf with a 1:1 dose equivalence is appropriate as an initial guideline. Our 1‐year follow‐up showed a transient decrease in tacrolimus levels, so closer monitoring of tacrolimus levels may be required after conversion. Liver Transpl 19:1151–1158, 2013 . © 2013 AASLD.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom