z-logo
Premium
Predictors of sustained virological response after antiviral treatment for hepatitis C recurrence following liver transplantation
Author(s) -
Cescon Matteo,
Grazi Gian Luca,
Cucchetti Alessandro,
Vetrone Gaetano,
Ravaioli Matteo,
Ercolani Giorgio,
Morelli Maria Cristina,
Piscaglia Fabio,
Tamè Mariarosa,
Pinna Antonio Daniele
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
liver transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.814
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1527-6473
pISSN - 1527-6465
DOI - 10.1002/lt.21760
Subject(s) - medicine , odds ratio , liver transplantation , gastroenterology , immunosuppression , confidence interval , tacrolimus , ribavirin , discontinuation , azathioprine , hepatitis c , transplantation , hepatitis c virus , immunology , virus , disease
Factors associated with sustained virological response (SVR) in patients treated for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are unclear. Ninety‐nine HCV‐positive/hepatitis B surface antigen–negative patients received antiviral treatment (AVT) with interferon/peginterferon plus ribavirin for HCV recurrence after LT. Cyclosporine (CyA) or tacrolimus (TAC) was used as the main immunosuppressor in 37 (37%) and 62 (63%) patients, respectively. Twenty‐five patients (25%) achieved an SVR. Twenty‐seven donor‐related, recipient‐related, HCV‐related, and immunosuppression‐related variables were investigated for their association with SVR. In logistic regression analysis, donor age < 60 years (odds ratio = 4.45, 95% confidence interval = 1.39‐14.19, P = 0.01), viral genotype other than 1 (odds ratio = 4.97, 95% confidence interval = 1.59‐15.48, P = 0.006), and the use of CyA during treatment (odds ratio = 6.85, 95% confidence interval = 2.15‐21.73, P = 0.001) were predictors of SVR. Patients treated with CyA (SVR rate: 43%) and those treated with TAC (SVR rate: 14%) were comparable for all variables, except for a shorter ischemia time and shorter timing of AVT initiation in the TAC group ( P = 0.02 and P = 0.005, respectively) and a greater use of anti‐CD25 antibodies, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil in the CyA group ( P = 0.03, P < 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). The rate of AVT discontinuation due to side effects was similar between groups (16% versus 8%, P = 0.3). In conclusion, the type of immunosuppression during AVT may predict SVR in patients treated for HCV recurrence after LT. Liver Transpl 15:782–789, 2009. © 2009 AASLD.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom