z-logo
Premium
Addition of adult‐to‐adult living donation to liver transplant programs improves survival but at an increased cost
Author(s) -
Northup Patrick G.,
Abecassis Michael M.,
Englesbe Michael J.,
Emond Jean C.,
Lee Vanessa D.,
Stukenborg George J.,
Tong Lan,
Berg Carl L.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
liver transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.814
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1527-6473
pISSN - 1527-6465
DOI - 10.1002/lt.21671
Subject(s) - medicine , liver transplantation , incremental cost effectiveness ratio , cohort , waiting list , cost effectiveness , quality adjusted life year , cirrhosis , transplantation , surgery , risk analysis (engineering)
Using outcomes data from the Adult‐to‐Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study, we performed a cost‐effectiveness analysis exploring the costs and benefits of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A multistage Markov decision analysis model was developed with treatment, including medical management only (strategy 1), waiting list with possible deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT; strategy 2), and waiting list with possible LDLT or DDLT (strategy 3) over 10 years. Decompensated cirrhosis with medical management offered survival of 2.0 quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) while costing an average of $65,068, waiting list with possible DDLT offered 4.4‐QALY survival and a mean cost of $151,613, and waiting list with possible DDLT or LDLT offered 4.9‐QALY survival and a mean cost of $208,149. Strategy 2 had an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $35,976 over strategy 1, whereas strategy 3 produced an ICER of $106,788 over strategy 2. On average, strategy 3 cost $47,693 more per QALY than strategy 1. Both DDLT and LDLT were cost‐effective compared to medical management of cirrhosis over our 10‐year study period. The addition of LDLT to a standard waiting list DDLT program is effective at improving recipient survival and preventing waiting list deaths but at a greater cost. Liver Transpl 15:148–162, 2009. © 2009 AASLD.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here