Premium
The impact of serum sodium concentration on mortality after liver transplantation: A cohort multicenter study
Author(s) -
Dawwas Muhammad F.,
Lewsey James D.,
Neuberger James M.,
Gimson Alexander E.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
liver transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.814
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1527-6473
pISSN - 1527-6465
DOI - 10.1002/lt.21154
Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , liver transplantation , confidence interval , gastroenterology , transplantation , cohort study , liver disease , cohort
Abstract Modification of the current allocation system for donor livers in the United States to incorporate recipient serum sodium concentration ([Na]) has recently been proposed. However, the impact of this parameter on posttransplantation mortality has not been previously examined in a large risk‐adjusted analysis. We assessed the effect of recipient [Na] on the survival of all adults with chronic liver disease who received a first single organ liver transplant in the UK and Ireland during the period March 1, 1994 to March 31, 2005 (n = 5,152) at 3 years, during the first 90 days, and beyond the first 90 days, adjusting for a wide range of recipient, donor, and graft characteristics. Compared to those with normal [Na] (135–145 meq/L; n = 3,066), severely hyponatremic recipients ([Na] <130 meq/L, n = 541), had a higher risk‐adjusted mortality at 3 years (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–1.59; P < 0.02). The excess mortality was, however, confined to the first 90 days (HR 1.55; 95% CI, 1.18–2.04; P < 0.002) with no significant difference thereafter. This was also true for hypernatremic recipients ([Na] >145 meq/L, n = 81), who had an even greater risk‐adjusted mortality compared to normonatremic recipients (overall: HR 1.85; 95% CI, 1.25–2.73; P < 0.002; ≤90 days: HR 2.29; 95% CI, 1.42–3.70; P < 0.001; >90 days: HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.55–2.29; P = 0.8), whereas mildly hyponatremic recipients ([Na] 130–134 meq/L, n = 1,127) had similar risk‐adjusted mortality to those with normal [Na] at the same time points. In conclusion, recipient [Na] is an independent predictor of death following liver transplantation. Attempts to correct the [Na] toward the normal reference range are an important aspect of pretransplantation management. Liver Transpl 13:1115–1124, 2007. © 2007 AASLD.