Premium
Impact of donor gender on male rat recipients of small‐for‐size liver grafts
Author(s) -
Gu Yanli,
Dirsch Olaf,
Dahmen Uta,
Ji Yuan,
He Qing,
Chi Haidong,
Broelsch Christoph Erich
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
liver transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.814
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1527-6473
pISSN - 1527-6465
DOI - 10.1002/lt.20408
Subject(s) - medicine , liver transplantation , urology , gastroenterology , transplantation
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of donor gender on small‐for‐size (SFS) liver transplantation in male recipients using a rat model. Adult female or male Lewis rats were used as donors and male Lewis rats as recipients. Size‐matched (SM) and SFS liver grafts from either male or female donors were transplanted into male recipients. Animals receiving SFS grafts were sacrificed at postoperative week 1, week 4, and week 12, respectively (n = 6‐8 per group), those receiving SM grafts after 3 months. The cumulative survival rate (SVR) in the female‐to‐male (F‐M) SFS group was significantly lower (62%; 13 of 21) compared with the male‐to‐male (M‐M) group (90%; 18 of 20) ( P < 0.05). Spontaneous death occurred in the F‐M SFS combination either in the early postoperative period (<3 weeks) in animals with confluent hepatic necrosis or in the late postoperative period (>8 weeks) in animals with biliary obstruction. In contrast, no death was observed in the early posttransplantation period after M‐M liver transplantation. The relative graft size in the SM F‐M group was significantly higher (graft‐to‐recipient weight ratio [GRWR] 2.40% ± 0.8%) than in the SFS M‐M group (GRWR 1.35% ± 0.2%; P < 0.001). Regardless of graft size, the outcome was worse in terms of SVR as well as regarding the incidence and severity of biliary complications in F‐M compared with M‐M liver transplantation. In conclusion, male recipients of female livers had a less favorable outcome irrespective of graft size. Confluent hepatic necrosis as well as biliary obstruction were perceived as consequence of a severe perfusion problem in F‐M liver transplantation, which was possibly related to an enhancement of ischemia‐reperfusion (I/R) injury by the lack of estrogen in male recipients of female grafts. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:669–678.)