z-logo
Premium
Treatment of burn scars with the 1,550 nm nonablative fractional Erbium Laser
Author(s) -
Waibel Jill,
Wulkan Adam J.,
Lupo Mary,
Beer Kenneth,
Anderson R. Rox
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
lasers in surgery and medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1096-9101
pISSN - 0196-8092
DOI - 10.1002/lsm.22038
Subject(s) - medicine , scars , dermatology , surgery
Background Scarring is a major source of morbidity in patients with burns. Burn scars are difficult to treat and are among the worst scars seen in clinical medicine. Fractional laser resurfacing is a promising treatment option because of its unique wound healing response and depth of penetration. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of nonablative fractional resurfacing as a therapeutic option for extensive cutaneous scarring in burn patients. Methods Prospective, single‐arm, pilot study. Ten subjects with second and third degree burn scars were treated with five nonablative fractional resurfacing treatments given at 4‐week intervals. Three independent investigators evaluated subject outcomes at 3 months post‐treatment (primary outcome); patients also provided subjective assessments of improvement (secondary outcome). Results Nonablative fractional resurfacing resulted in overall improvement in 90% of subjects, as determined by independent investigators; improvements were moderate to excellent in 60%. Ninety percent of subjects had improved skin texture, 80% had improved dyschromia, and 80% had improved hypertrophy/atrophy. Patients' self‐reports also revealed moderate to excellent improvements (on average) in burn scar area, and significant improvements in self‐esteem at 3 months post‐treatment ( P  = 0.03). Limitations Small sample size and lack of control group. Conclusions Fractional resurfacing is a promising new treatment modality for burn scars. We should continue to identify novel approaches and management strategies for the spectrum of diverse burn scars so that we can better treat this patient population. Lasers Surg. Med. 44: 441–446, 2012. © Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here