z-logo
Premium
Effects of varying argon ion laser intensity and exposure time on the ablation of atherosclerotic plaque
Author(s) -
Strikwerda Sipke,
BottSilverman Corinne,
Ratliff Norman B.,
Goormastic Marlene,
Cothren Robert M.,
Costello Ben,
Kittrell Carter,
Feld Michael S.,
Kramer John R.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
lasers in surgery and medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.888
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1096-9101
pISSN - 0196-8092
DOI - 10.1002/lsm.1900080112
Subject(s) - fluence , ablation , laser , materials science , argon , intensity (physics) , continuous wave , laser ablation , coagulative necrosis , optics , nuclear medicine , chemistry , medicine , pathology , physics , organic chemistry
Using continuous wave (CW) argon ion laser light, a total of 253 laser exposures of varying power (1.5, 3, 5, 8 or 10 W) and duration (20–1,333 ms) were delivered to four segments of human atheromatous aorta obtained at autopsy. Exposure conditions were controlled by using an optically shielded laser catheter that provided a 500 μm spot of light of known power. Two thresholds for consistently reproducible ablation could be defined–an intensity threshold at 25.5 W/mm 2 and a fluence threshold at 3.2 J/mm 2 . Above threshold, a fluence of 5.1 J/mm 2 was found to produce the most efficient ablation, ie, removed the greatest volume (mm 3 ) per energy delivered (J) compared to other fluence levels employed (p < 0.0001). Between aortic segments, however, considerable variability in efficiency (mm 3 /J) was observed, possibly owing to different optical properties and/or plaque composition. Low‐intensity laser radiation produced inconsistent ablation and extensive coagulation effects to surrounding tissue. When a fluence of 5.1 J/mm 2 was constructed with a high‐intensity laser beam and a short exposure time, consistent and efficient tissue removal resulted without histologic evidence of coagulation necrosis.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here