Premium
An evaluation of potentiometric pH sensors in coastal monitoring applications
Author(s) -
McLaughlin Karen,
Nezlin Nikolay P.,
Weisberg Stephen B.,
Dickson Andrew G.,
Booth J. Ashley,
Cash Curtis L.,
Feit Adriano,
Gully Joseph R.,
Johnson Scott,
Latker Ami,
Mengel Michael J.,
Robertson George L.,
Steele Alex,
Terriquez Laura
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography: methods
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.898
H-Index - 72
ISSN - 1541-5856
DOI - 10.1002/lom3.10191
Subject(s) - potentiometric titration , bottle , calibration , environmental science , ph meter , significant difference , analytical chemistry (journal) , chemistry , electrode , sampling (signal processing) , environmental chemistry , materials science , mathematics , statistics , composite material , optics , detector , physics
A wealth of historical coastal water pH data has been collected using potentiometric glass electrodes, but the accuracy and stability of these sensors is poorly understood. Here we compared pH measurements from five potentiometric sensors incorporated into profiling Sea‐Bird instrument packages and compared them to spectrophotometric measurements on discrete bottle samples collected at two to three depths associated with each cast. Differences ranged from −0.509 to +0.479 with a mean difference of −0.055 pH units. Ninety‐two percent of the measurements were within ± 0.2 pH units, but 1% of the measurements had differences greater than 0.322. Sensor performance was affected by depth, but most of the difference was associated with calibration shortcomings. Sensor drift within a day was negligible; moreover, differences between bottle samples and electrode measurements within a sampling day were smaller than differences across days. Bootstrap analysis indicated that conducting a daily in situ calibration would reduce the mean difference to 0.002 pH units and increase the number of samples within a 0.2 pH unit error to 98%.