Premium
Reply to a comment by Watras et al. (2014) on temperature compensation method for field measurements of CDOM fluorescence
Author(s) -
Ryder Elizabeth,
Jennings Eleanor,
de Eyto Elvira,
Dillane Mary,
Nic Aonghusa Caitriona,
Pierson Donald C.,
Moore Karen,
Rouen Martin,
Poole Russell
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography: methods
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.898
H-Index - 72
ISSN - 1541-5856
DOI - 10.1002/lom3.10045
Subject(s) - colored dissolved organic matter , quenching (fluorescence) , compensation (psychology) , field (mathematics) , fluorescence , thermodynamics , physics , chemistry , optics , mathematics , psychology , organic chemistry , phytoplankton , nutrient , psychoanalysis , pure mathematics
The recent comment by Watras et al. (2014) clarifies the calculation of the temperature correction coefficient (ρ) in Watras et al. (2011). Based on this clarification, we accept that the equation to compensate for temperature quenching of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) fluorescence presented in Ryder et al. (2012) and the equation proposed in Watras et al. (2011) are mathematically equivalent.