Premium
Energy‐based top‐down and bottom‐up relationships between fish community energy demand or production and phytoplankton across lakes at a continental scale
Author(s) -
Bartrons Mireia,
Mehner Thomas,
Argillier Christine,
Beklioglu Meryem,
Blabolil Petr,
Hesthagen Trygve,
Holmgren Kerstin,
Jeppesen Erik,
Krause Teet,
Podgornik Samo,
Volta Pietro,
Winfield Ian J.,
Brucet Sandra
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 1939-5590
pISSN - 0024-3590
DOI - 10.1002/lno.11434
Subject(s) - phytoplankton , environmental science , biomass (ecology) , piscivore , temperate climate , ecology , community structure , trophic level , omnivore , zooplankton , biology , fishery , predation , nutrient , predator
Fish community feeding and production rates may differ between lakes despite similar fish biomass levels because of differences in size structure and local temperature. Therefore, across‐lake comparisons of the strength and direction of top‐down and bottom‐up fish–phytoplankton relationships should consider these factors. We used the metabolic theory of ecology to calculate size‐ and temperature‐corrected community energy demand (CED om ) and community production (CP) of omnivorous fishes in 227 European lakes from major habitat types (MHTs) of polar freshwaters, temperate floodplain rivers and wetlands, and temperate coastal rivers. We related CED om with total phosphorus (TP)‐corrected chlorophyll a (Chl a ) concentrations to evaluate a potential top‐down directed trophic cascade from fish to phytoplankton. Furthermore, we related Chl a with CP to demonstrate potential bottom‐up effects of phytoplankton on fish. For both analyses, we added the CED of piscivorous fishes (CED pi ) as a predictor to account for potential predation effects on the omnivorous fish community. CED om was weakly positively related with TP‐corrected Chl a , but the strength of the relationship differed between MHTs. In contrast, CP was consistently positively related with Chl a in the entire dataset. CED pi did not contribute to top‐down or bottom‐up relationships. The application of metabolic variables characterizing fish community feeding and production rates makes these results robust because the approach accounted for the usually neglected effects of fish size and temperature in across‐lake comparisons. Our results suggest that bottom‐up effects from phytoplankton on fish secondary production in lakes are substantially stronger than top‐down effects from fish on phytoplankton biomass.