Premium
Quantifying spatial and temporal variations in phytoplankton and kelp isotopic signatures to estimate the distribution of kelp‐derived detritus off the west coast of Vancouver Island, Canada
Author(s) -
Ramshaw Brock C.,
Pakhomov Evgeny A.,
Markel Russell W.,
Kaehler Sven
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 1939-5590
pISSN - 0024-3590
DOI - 10.1002/lno.10555
Subject(s) - kelp , kelp forest , phytoplankton , oceanography , detritus , transect , environmental science , abundance (ecology) , ecology , biology , geology , nutrient
We used stable isotopes to determine spatial and temporal patterns of suspended kelp‐derived detritus (KDD) along a Macrocystis kelp abundance gradient driven by recovering sea otter ( Enhydra lutris ) populations along the west coast of Vancouver Island. Three dominant kelp species (order Laminariales) and surface marine size‐fractionated particulate organic matter (POM) were sampled along offshore transects (0–30 km) within three regions during summer and winter. Nearshore phytoplankton isotope values were identified in regions with high chlorophyll a concentrations. Summer blooming phytoplankton δ 13 C values were enriched by 2.4‰ and 0.8‰ and δ 15 N was enriched by 1.2‰ and 0.3‰ for 20–63 μm and 0.7–20 μm POM, respectively. Macrophyte stable isotope values varied significantly within and among regions, as well as between seasons. Primary producer values were used in a Bayesian isotope mixing model (MixSIR) to estimate the KDD contribution to POM. In general, the kelp abundant region had a greater contribution of KDD to POM further away (from 4 km to 30 km) from the kelp forest (range of medians 7–58%) compared to the kelp sparse region (4–30%). Seasonally, the KDD contribution to 20–63 μm POM size fractions was greater during summer (33% average) compared to winter (16% average). These results indicated that kelp abundance is not the only driver of KDD dispersal spatially and temporally. Factors such as local oceanography, large variation in kelp isotope values, and similarity between kelp and shelf phytoplankton isotope values affect these patterns and lead to high uncertainty in modeled KDD contributions.