Premium
Reconstructing the seasonal dynamics and relative contribution of the major processes sustaining CO 2 emissions in northern lakes
Author(s) -
Vachon Dominic,
Solomon Christopher T.,
del Giorgio Paul A.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 1939-5590
pISSN - 0024-3590
DOI - 10.1002/lno.10454
Subject(s) - environmental science , hypolimnion , benthic zone , abiotic component , carbon cycle , climate change , greenhouse gas , seasonality , pelagic zone , atmospheric sciences , hydrology (agriculture) , ecology , ecosystem , eutrophication , nutrient , geology , biology , geotechnical engineering
Abstract Lake CO 2 emissions are an important component of the carbon balance of northern landscapes, yet the temporal dynamics of the underlying mechanisms sustaining CO 2 emissions are less understood. Here, we reconstruct the major biotic and abiotic processes influencing CO 2 dynamics over an annual cycle in three limnologically different lakes, using a combination of empirical measurements and process‐based modeling. Our results suggest that the relative importance of each process sustaining CO 2 emissions is not only variable among lakes, but also highly variable among seasons within one lake. Spring CO 2 emissions were largely sustained by the release of under ice accumulation (between about 50–100%), although photo‐chemical DOC mineralization and hydrologic CO 2 loading were also relatively important. In summer, due to warmer temperature, pelagic and benthic metabolism were the main sources of CO 2 emissions. In the fall, lake CO 2 emissions were generally sustained by hydrologic CO 2 inputs, while hypolimnetic CO 2 accumulation and release also contributed to fall CO 2 emission in the deepest lake. On an annual basis, lake CO 2 emissions ranged between 21.4 g C m −2 yr −1 and 55.5 g C m −2 yr −1 . Our results confirm that the major processes all contributed significantly to CO 2 emissions, but their relative contributions were modulated by the seasonal patterns in climate and hydrology, and by differences in morphology and organic carbon inputs among lakes. These lake‐ and season‐specific features need to be considered both in the upscaling of lake processes at regional scales, and in predicting lake CO 2 emissions under scenarios of climate and environmental change.