Premium
Model‐based interpretation of sediment concentration and vertical flux measurements in a shallow estuarine environment
Author(s) -
Brand Andreas,
Lacy Jessica R.,
Gladding Steve,
Holleman Rusty,
Stacey Mark
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
limnology and oceanography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 197
eISSN - 1939-5590
pISSN - 0024-3590
DOI - 10.1002/lno.10047
Subject(s) - settling , sediment , water column , geology , estuary , flux (metallurgy) , particle (ecology) , shoal , soil science , hydrology (agriculture) , environmental science , geomorphology , oceanography , chemistry , geotechnical engineering , organic chemistry , environmental engineering
A one‐dimensional numerical model describing tidally varying vertical mixing and settling was used to interpret sediment concentrations and vertical fluxes observed in the shoals of South San Francisco Bay by two acoustic Doppler velocimeters (ADVs) at elevations of 0.36 m and 0.72 m above bed. Measured sediment concentrations changed by up to 100 g m −3 over the semidiurnal tidal cycle. These dynamics were dominated by local resuspension and settling. Multiple particle class models suggested the existence of a class with fast settling velocities ( w s of 9.0 × 10 −4 m s −1 in spring and 5.8 × 10 −4 m s −1 in fall) and a slowly settling particle fraction ( w s of <1 × 10 −7 m s −1 in spring and 1.4 × 10 −5 m s −1 in fall). Modeled concentrations of slowly settling particles at 0.36 m were as high as 20 g m −3 during fall and varied with the spring‐neap cycle while fine sediment concentrations in spring were constant around 5 g m −3 . Analysis of in situ water column floc size distributions suggested that floc properties in the lower part of the water column were most likely governed by particle‐size distribution on the bed and not by coagulation, validating our multiple particle size approach. A comparison of different sediment bed models with respect to model performance, sensitivity, and identifiability suggested that the use of a sediment erosion model linear in bottom shear stress τ b ( E = M ( τ b − τ c )) was the most appropriate choice to describe the field observations when the critical shear stress τ c and the proportionality factor M were kept constant.