Premium
Questionnaires mentioned in academic research 1996–2019: Rapid increase but declining citation impact
Author(s) -
Fairclough Ruth,
Thelwall Mike
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
learned publishing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.06
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1741-4857
pISSN - 0953-1513
DOI - 10.1002/leap.1417
Subject(s) - citation , scopus , terminology , sample (material) , citation impact , psychology , nonprobability sampling , impact factor , sampling (signal processing) , quality (philosophy) , medical education , library science , political science , medicine , demography , medline , sociology , computer science , law , population , linguistics , philosophy , chemistry , filter (signal processing) , chromatography , epistemology , computer vision
Questionnaires are a device to elicit human perspectives, self‐reports or knowledge. This article investigates which broad academic fields use questionnaires, whether this use is increasing, and whether it generates average citation impact. This is investigated through a nonprobability sample: articles mentioning questionnaires in their titles, abstracts, or keywords. This procedure captures a minority of research using questionnaires, with substantial biases against fields using alternative terminology, such as ‘instrument’ or ‘survey’, or that rarely explicitly mention questionnaires in titles, abstract or keywords because they play a minor role. The results suggest that the proportion of journal articles using questionnaires tripled between 1996 and 2019, and this proportion increased in all 27 broad Scopus fields. Over the same period, the citation impact of the identified research declined from above average to below average. Thus, whilst academic research seems to be increasingly using questionnaires, the quality or scholarly value of research using questionnaires may be declining. These are tentative conclusions because of the unknown sampling bias for the set of questionnaire‐based articles analysed.