Premium
Soil conservation in two English catchments: Linking soil management with policies
Author(s) -
Posthumus H.,
Deeks L. K.,
Fenn I.,
Rickson R. J.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
land degradation and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1099-145X
pISSN - 1085-3278
DOI - 10.1002/ldr.987
Subject(s) - soil conservation , soil governance , soil retrogression and degradation , soil compaction , soil functions , land degradation , sustainable land management , soil management , environmental science , environmental planning , dryland salinity , business , erosion control , land management , agriculture , environmental resource management , soil biodiversity , soil health , erosion , soil fertility , soil water , soil organic matter , geography , soil science , paleontology , archaeology , biology
Soil degradation, specifically soil compaction and soil erosion can have significant impacts in some parts of England. The southwest of England is particularly vulnerable to soil erosion and compaction due to the region's erodible soils. This paper discusses the soil degradation problems, the policies addressing these problems and the stakeholders involved in the Parrett and Axe catchments. Key informants, including farmers, farm advisors and policy makers, were interviewed on their perceptions on soil degradation and soil mitigation measures, and the effectiveness of agricultural policies to encourage sustainable soil management. Until recently, mitigating soil degradation has been indirectly addressed through various agricultural and environmental policies, such as the cross‐compliance regulations that accompany the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and agri‐environment schemes. Recent initiatives, in particular the Catchment Sensitive Farming (CSF) scheme, have contributed to reversing the trend of soil degradation locally by engaging farmers and providing better advice on land management. However, the main focus of current policy initiatives and accompanying measures tends to focus on the control of diffuse water pollution rather than protecting or conserving soil in situ , and gaps remain in the implementation of effective targeted measures. A more integrated approach to land and water management, consisting of voluntary and regulatory measures, involving farmers and other stakeholders, tailored to local circumstances and supported by economic incentives and advisory services, is recommended. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.