Premium
Composition and diversity of prokaryotes at an iron ore post‐mining site revealed the natural resilience 10 years after mining exploitation
Author(s) -
Cardoso Emanuelle Burgos,
Júnior Paulo Prates,
Cássia Soares da Silva Marliane,
Cerqueira Alan Emanuel Silva,
Jordão Thuany Cerqueira,
Moreira Bruno Coutinho,
Pereira Eduardo Gusmão,
Kasuya Maria Catarina Megumi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
land degradation and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1099-145X
pISSN - 1085-3278
DOI - 10.1002/ldr.3713
Subject(s) - verrucomicrobia , acidobacteria , actinobacteria , thaumarchaeota , proteobacteria , archaea , biology , revegetation , ecology , botany , ecological succession , bacteria , 16s ribosomal rna , genetics
Prokaryotes play crucial roles in the rehabilitation process to restore the ecological integrity of disturbed areas. This work reports on the profiles of N‐fixing microorganisms and Actinobacteria, from DGGE, the prokaryotic composition from next‐generation sequencing (NGS) and physicochemical soil characteristics. We compared a deactivated mining site where mining ended about 10 years ago, when the revegetation process was begun (RV), and a reference site, with natural vegetation (NT), both located at Retiro das Almas Mine, in the Quadrilátero Ferrífero region, Minas Gerais, Brazil. In both sites, the most abundant archaeal and bacterial groups included Euryarchaeota, Thaumarchaeota, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia and revealed differences in their ecological metrics and distribution. Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were most abundant in RV sites, while Acidobacteria and Verrucomicrobia were most abundant in NT sites. Less abundant phyla, such as Bathyarchaeota (Archaea) and GAL 15 (Bacteria) were found only in NT, while Gracilibacteria, Ignavibacteriae BJ‐169, and BRC1 were only found in RV. The majority of identified bacterial genera were shared by RV and NT. Soil P, pH, and particle density were most significant ( p < 0.05) in RV, while Fe, Ca, organic matter, potential acidity and dispersed clays, were most significant ( p < 0.05) in NT, showing differences in soil characteristics, which led the prokaryotic composition in these sites. DGGE profiles of N‐fixing microorganisms revealed N‐fixing predominance in both sites, although after 10 years prokaryotes diversity increased in RV site. Our results revealed that prokaryotic structure and composition are indicative of RV soil resilience.