Premium
Implantable Doppler Ultrasound Monitoring in Head and Neck Free Flaps: Balancing the Pros and Cons
Author(s) -
Hayler Raymond,
Low TsuHui (Hubert),
Fung Kevin,
Nichols Anthony C.,
MacNeil S. Danielle,
Yoo John
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.29247
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , head and neck , gold standard (test) , cons , prospective cohort study , free flap , ultrasound , predictive value , doppler ultrasound , radiology , computer science , programming language
Objectives/Hypothesis Free flap transfer offers a versatile option for reconstruction in head and neck surgery, with success rates over 95%. There remains a substantial re‐exploration rate of roughly 5% to 15%, with early recognition of compromise essential to flap survival. Monitoring techniques are highly desirable, with the gold standard being clinical monitoring. The Cook‐Swartz Doppler (CSD) probe utilizes Doppler technology to inform clinicians about real‐time flow. We aim to describe our adoption of this technology in 100 consecutive free flaps. Study Design Prospective case series. Methods Prospective data were collected from July 2014 to June 2015 on 100 consecutive free flaps performed at a head and neck unit in London, Ontario. All patients had a CSD inserted for arterial and venous monitoring. Results A total of 100 free flaps were performed on 99 patients. Sensitivity was 87.1% and specificity was 85.7%. Positive predictive value was 98.8% and negative predictive value was 33.3%. False‐negative and false‐positive rate were 1.0% and 12.0%, respectively. The exploration rate was 12%, with no flap loss and two partial debridements. The CSD was helpful in management in 9% of cases and was clinically unhelpful in 11% of cases, with 10 of 11 abnormal signals ignored. There were three unique CSD complications; one retained wire, one pedicle laceration during extraction, and one clot around the probe interrupting signal. Conclusions The CSD is a helpful adjunct to clinical monitoring but has unique complications, which were not previously described. Pros and cons must be considered for new centers adopting this technology. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope , 131:E1854–E1859, 2021