z-logo
Premium
A Review of Otolaryngology Malpractice Cases with Associated Court Proceedings from 2010 to 2019
Author(s) -
Ceremsak John,
Miller Lauren E.,
Gomez Ernest D.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.29232
Subject(s) - otorhinolaryngology , rhinology , subspecialty , medicine , malpractice , plaintiff , medical malpractice , indemnity , jury , family medicine , general surgery , surgery , law , political science
Objectives/Hypothesis To report key characteristics of the landscape of malpractice litigation with associated court proceedings in otolaryngology over the previous decade. Study Design Retrospective database review. Methods The LexisNexis database was queried to identify otolaryngology‐related malpractices cases that yielded court opinions, jury verdicts, and settlements from federal and state courts across the United States from 2010 to 2019. Cases settled outside of court were not identifiable. Provider subspecialty, procedures, error type, legal allegations, and case outcomes were recorded. Frequency of error type was compared between otolaryngology subspecialties using Fisher exact tests. Results Ninety‐four medical malpractice cases related to otolaryngology with evidence of court proceedings were identified for the period between 2010 and 2019. An otolaryngologist was named as the sole defendant in 39 cases (41%). Rhinology was the most frequently implicated subspecialty (28% of all cases), followed by head and neck surgery (17%) and facial plastics (7%). Improper surgical performance was cited in nearly half of the identified cases (49%), followed by failure to diagnose/refer/treat (32%). Outcome and liability data were available for 56 cases (60%). Of these 56 cases, 50 (89%) were ruled in favor of the defendant otolaryngologist. Of the cases ruled in favor of the plaintiff, the average indemnity was $4.24 M (range, $150,000 M–$10.25 M). Fisher exact tests demonstrated statistically significant differences in consent issues ( P = .040), failure to diagnose/refer/treat ( P = .024), and improper surgical performance ( P = .026) between subspecialties. Conclusions In a limited, database‐derived sample of medical malpractice cases involving otolaryngologists, trends in error type by subspecialty may warrant further investigation to identify specialty‐wide and subspecialty‐specific areas of practice improvement and education. Level of Evidence N/A Laryngoscope , 131:E1081–E1085, 2021

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here