Premium
Additional Injection Laryngoplasty for Patients With Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
Author(s) -
Choi Nayeon,
Won Seongjun,
Jin Hokyung,
Kim Hack Jung,
Park Woori,
Son YoungIk
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.28567
Subject(s) - medicine , vocal fold paralysis , breathy voice , laryngoplasty , phonation , surgery , vocal folds , paralysis , audiology , larynx
Objectives In case of insufficient voice improvement after injection laryngoplasty (IL), additional IL will be one of the next option of treatments. However, little is known about the voice outcomes regarding an additional IL. Study design Retrospective comparative study in single institution. Methods We enrolled the patients of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP), who received IL (N = 76) twice because of insufficient voice improvement. The etiologies of UVFP were related with thoracic and esophageal surgery (51.3%), neck surgery (30.3%), skull base surgery (7.9%), or unknown (10.5%). The subjective and objective voice parameters were collected before and after (mean: 5.3 months) each IL. Results Aspiration, maximum phonation time (MPT), jitter percentage, shimmer percentage, and noise to harmonic ratio (NHR) were significantly improved after both the first and second rounds of IL ( P < .05). Voice handicap index (VHI)–30 was also significantly improved after both the first and second rounds of IL ( P < .001). Regarding GRBAS score, overall grade of dysphonia (G), roughness (R), and breathiness (B) were significantly improved after the first IL, but only G and R after the second IL ( P < .05). In comparison between postprocedural voice parameters of the first and second ILs, MPT was significantly improved from 5.5 ± 3.5 seconds to 7.3 ± 7.5 seconds ( P = .001). Grade of dysphonia (1.9 ± 0.8) and breathiness (1.7 ± 0.9) of post‐first IL were significantly ( P < .001) improved to those of post‐second IL (1.3 ± 0.7 and 1.2 ± 0.7, respectively). VHI‐30 of post‐first IL (72.0 ± 20) was significantly improved ( P < .001) to those of the second IL (57.2 ± 23.7). Conclusions In selected patients, additional IL could provide further improvement of voice in patient who had unsatisfactory voice results despite of initial IL. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope , 2020