z-logo
Premium
Secondary Tracheoesophageal Puncture After Laryngectomy Increases Complications With Shunt and Voice Prosthesis
Author(s) -
Scherl Claudia,
Kauffels Julia,
Schützenberger Anne,
Döllinger Michael,
Bohr Christopher,
Dürr Stephan,
Fietkau Rainer,
Haderlein Marlen,
Koch Michael,
Traxdorf Maximilian,
Mantsopoulos Konstantinos,
Müller Sarina,
Iro Heinrich
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.28517
Subject(s) - medicine , voice prosthesis , laryngectomy , prosthesis , surgery , retrospective cohort study , radiation therapy , complication , chemoradiotherapy , hazard ratio , logistic regression , confidence interval , larynx
Objectives/Hypothesis To evaluate the demographics, clinical features, management, and prognostic indicators of tracheoesophageal puncture complications in patients undergoing placement of voice prosthesis following cancer treatment. Study Design Retrospective analysis. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of cases from a tertiary referral center diagnosed between 1996 and 2015. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) and voice prostheses–complication‐free survival (TEP/VP‐CFS). Results One hundred fourteen cases were identified. Most patients were males (92.9%) with pT3 (26.8%) or pT4 (58.1%) N+ (53.6%) tumors. All patients received laryngectomy as the primary treatment, with 75% of patients receiving adjuvant radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy. Complications with TEP were common (65.2%). The most frequent problem was salivary leakage (50.0%), which at the same time was the most common reason for changing the prosthesis. On univariate regression analysis, prosthesis placement time after adjuvant radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2‐8.69), secondary prosthesis placement after primary surgery (HR: 3.97, 95% CI: 1.99‐7.9), and laryngectomy with flap reconstruction (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 0.99‐3.89) were significant prognosticators for complications. Multivariate regression analysis revealed secondary prosthesis placement after adjuvant radiotherapy (HR: 3.66, 95% CI: 1.39‐9.68) or after primary surgery (HR: 2.57, 95% CI: 0.92‐7.2) to be the strongest predictors of reduced TEP/VP‐CFS. Conclusions Secondary prosthesis placement after primary surgery, placement after previous irradiation, and laryngectomy with flap reconstruction are predictors of poor TEP/VP‐CFS. Planned adjuvant radiotherapy is not a contraindication for TEP with prosthetic placement, but it is very important to place the prosthesis during the primary surgery or at least before scheduled radiotherapy. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope , 2020

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom