z-logo
Premium
Surgery versus radiation for T1 glottic carcinoma: Second primary considerations
Author(s) -
Puram Sidharth V.,
Bhattacharyya Neil
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.27854
Subject(s) - medicine , larynx , incidence (geometry) , surgery , carcinoma , radiation therapy , cumulative incidence , epidemiology , laryngeal neoplasm , physics , transplantation , optics
Although early glottic carcinoma is managed with radiation therapy (RT) or surgery, there is limited data on differences in second primary cancers of the larynx. We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to query T1 glottic carcinomas and assess the incidence of second primary laryngeal malignancies. Cumulative hazard for second primary laryngeal malignancies was compared with the log‐rank method. Among 844 surgical and 2,272 RT cases, observed‐to‐expected incidence ratios of laryngeal second primaries were 10.19 (5.89–16.55) and 6.87 (4.64–9.81) per 10 thousand person‐years, respectively. Mean person‐years at risk were comparable at 8.16 years (surgery) and 8.01 years (RT), and relative increased risk of laryngeal second primary was 20.95 (surgery) versus 14.09 (RT) per 10 thousand person‐years. Mean times to development of a second primary were also comparable (304 vs. 305 months, P = 0.898). Thus, second laryngeal primary development is analogous between cases treated with surgery alone versus RT. Continued discussion and investigation of surgery versus RT for early glottic squamous cell carcinoma will need to leverage these findings, along with ongoing investigation of voice and survival outcomes, to develop more well‐informed treatment algorithms. Laryngoscope , 129:2713–2715, 2019

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here