Premium
Magnetic resonance imaging with cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants: Are we truly practicing MRI safety?
Author(s) -
Shew Matthew,
Wichova Helena,
Lin James,
Ledbetter Luke N.,
Staecker Hinrich
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.27516
Subject(s) - magnetic resonance imaging , brainstem , cochlear implant , medicine , cochlear implantation , audiology , cochlea , radiology
Objective Our objective is to evaluate the safety in patients with cochlear implants (CIs) and auditory brainstem implants (ABI) undergoing 1.5 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Secondly, we want to raise awareness on CI and MRI safety, and advocate for continued improvement and advancement to minimize morbidity for our CI patients. Methods Retrospective case series from 2006 to 2018 at a single tertiary academic center. Data was collected on patients with CI or auditory brainstem implants undergoing MRI. Outcomes collected include demographic data, age at time of MRI, MRI characteristics, complications, CI manufacturer, and image quality. Results Eighteen patients with CI or ABI collectively underwent a total of 62 MRI scans. Five of 15 (33%) CI patients with magnet had complications: five total of 24 MRI scans (21%). Two patients had magnet removal prior to 29 MRI scans without complications. Four of five MRI‐related complications were equipped with a U.S. Food and Drug Administration‐approved head wrap. Three of five required a trip to the operating room to explore and reposition the CI magnet; two could not complete MRI secondary to pain. Of the complications, two were Cochlear (Sydney, Australia), two Advanced Bionics (Valencia, CA), and one MED‐EL (Innsbruck, Austria). Synchrony model (MED‐EL) had 0 of seven complications, with a total of 19 MRI scans, which features a freely rotating and self‐aligning magnet. Conclusion Our series offers a diverse number of CI manufacturers and is in accordance with other literature that CI MRI‐related adverse events are occurring at an unacceptable frequency. We can promote CI MRI safety through our institutions' MRI CI patient protocols, raise awareness that diagnostic MRI benefits must outweigh CI‐related complications, and advocate for continued industry technological innovation. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope , 129:482–489, 2019