Premium
Comparison of the seventh and eighth edition american joint committee on cancer oral cavity staging systems
Author(s) -
Cramer John D.,
Reddy Abhita,
Ferris Robert L.,
Duvvuri Umamaheswar,
Samant Sandeep
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.27205
Subject(s) - concordance , medicine , cancer staging , stage (stratigraphy) , pathological staging , cancer , ajcc staging system , cohort , oral cavity , pathological , staging system , tnm staging system , retrospective cohort study , t stage , oncology , dentistry , paleontology , biology
Objective For the first time in 30 years, the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual offers major changes in the staging of oral cavity cancer. We evaluated the predictive ability of the new staging system for oral cavity cancer to validate these changes and hypothesized that the new system would improve prognostic accuracy. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma in the National Cancer Data Base from 2009 to 2013 and applied the seventh and eighth edition staging AJCC staging systems to all patients. Stage‐specific overall survival was calculated using the Kaplan‐Meier method and concordance indices to measure the system's prognostic accuracy. Results We identified 39,361 patients with a median follow‐up of 27.1 months (range 0.1–80.4 months). In the seventh edition, there were 43.0%, 15.0%, 10.6%, and 25.7% of patients with pathologic stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively. After restaging based on eighth edition pathological guidelines, 10.0% of patients were upstaged (38.1%, 18.1%, 14.2%, and 25.2%, respectively, with stage I, II, III, and IV disease, respectively). The survival concordance index improved from the seventh to eighth edition for pathological staging (concordance index 0.699 and 0.704, respectively) and for clinical staging (concordance index 0.714 and 0.715, respectively). Conclusion We provide validation of the new AJCC staging system for oral cavity cancer. Eighth edition AJCC staging guidelines upstage a substantial number of patients with greater depth of invasion or extranodal extension. This resulted in slightly improved prognostication. Level of Evidence 2c. Laryngoscope , 128:2351–2360, 2018