Premium
Resident responses to after‐hours otolaryngology patient phone calls: An overlooked aspect of residency training?
Author(s) -
Lehmann Ashton E.,
Kozin Elliott D.,
Sethi Rosh K. V.,
Wong Kevin,
Lin Brian M.,
Gray Stacey T.,
Cunningham Michael J.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.26784
Subject(s) - medicine , otorhinolaryngology , phone , triage , demographics , phone call , documentation , medical emergency , residency training , emergency department , graduate medical education , emergency medicine , retrospective cohort study , family medicine , surgery , accreditation , nursing , continuing education , computer science , programming language , linguistics , philosophy , demography , sociology , medical education
Objectives/Hypothesis Otolaryngology residents are often responsible for triaging after‐hours patient calls. However, residents receive little training on this topic. Data are limited on the clinical content, reporting, and management of otolaryngology patient calls. This study aimed to characterize the patient concerns residents handle by phone and their subsequent management and reporting. Study Design Retrospective review. Methods Five hundred consecutive after‐hours patient calls in a tertiary pediatric hospital were reviewed. Data collected included patient and caller demographics, clinical concerns, surgical history, recommendations, and subsequent emergency department (ED) visits. Results On average, 3.7 calls occurred per shift, 2.8 on weekday and 5.9 on weekend shifts. Mean patient age was 6.6 years. Mothers (71%) called most frequently. The majority of calls were postoperative (64.2%). Of postoperative calls, most occurred within 3 days of surgery (52.3%). Most calls were for surgical site bleeding (19.9%). Residents recommended ED evaluation for 17.2% of calls, of which 20.9% returned to the primary institution ED. ED evaluation was recommended more frequently for postoperative patients ( P = .040), particularly following adenotonsillectomy (51.2%) or surgical site bleeding (18.6%). With respect to documentation, 32.8% of medical record numbers were absent, 11.8% had name errors, and 2.2% of patients could not be identified. Conclusions This is the first study to analyze the management and reporting of patient calls by otolaryngology residents. A wide array of clinical concerns are triaged by phone conversations. The study has implications for both resident and patient education. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope , 128:E163–E170, 2018