z-logo
Premium
Locoregional recurrence following maxillectomy: implications for microvascular reconstruction
Author(s) -
Likhterov Ilya,
Fritz Michael A.,
ElSayed Ivan H.,
Rayess Hani M.,
Knott P. Daniel
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.26620
Subject(s) - medicine , malignancy , surgery , cohort , stage (stratigraphy) , retrospective cohort study , quality of life (healthcare) , biopsy , radiology , paleontology , nursing , biology
Objective Reconstruction of maxillectomy defects offers potential quality‐of‐life improvement, although cavity coverage may impact surveillance of recurrent malignancy. We describe the pattern of postmaxillectomy locoregional recurrence. Study Design Retrospective review. Methods Patients from 2001 to 2011 at the University of California, San Francisco and the Cleveland Clinic. Results Among 75 patients with malignancy resulting in partial or total maxillectomy, 57 were treated with obturators and 18 underwent reconstructive surgery. Disease recurrence occurred primarily locally (19 of 22 cases of recurrence, 25% of the cohort) at a mean of 17 months postoperatively. Recurrence was associated with T4 disease, positive margins, and surveillance imaging. Four (5.3%) patients required flap mobilization/obturator removal to obtain biopsy. Salvage surgery was attempted in 13 of the 19 cases with recurrent disease (68%) and was successful in six (46%) patients. Of these, five patients initially had Brown type 1 or type 2 defects. The free flap had to be revised in one (1.3%) patient to achieve successful salvage. Conclusion Maxillectomy provides good long‐term locoregional oncologic control, with cure being correlated to disease stage at presentation and negative margins after initial surgery. Patients with recurrent disease whose initial resection resulted in a Brown class 3 defect or greater were rarely successfully salvaged. Surveillance is best performed with a combination of physical exam and imaging. Obturator removal/flap mobilization rarely impedes the diagnosis of recurrent disease, and either modality should be offered to appropriate patients in the primary setting if significant quality‐of‐life improvement is likely. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope , 127:2534–2538, 2017

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here