Premium
High variability of facial muscle innervation by facial nerve branches: A prospective electrostimulation study
Author(s) -
Raslan Ashraf,
Volk Gerd Fabian,
Möller Martin,
Stark Vincent,
Eckhardt Nikolas,
GuntinasLichius Orlando
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.26349
Subject(s) - facial nerve , anatomy , medicine , facial muscles , nose , stimulation , zygomatic arch , orbicularis oculi muscle , surgery , eyelid
Objectives/Hypothesis To examine by intraoperative electric stimulation which peripheral facial nerve (FN) branches are functionally connected to which facial muscle functions. Study Design Single‐center prospective clinical study. Methods Seven patients whose peripheral FN branching was exposed during parotidectomy under FN monitoring received a systematic electrostimulation of each branch starting with 0.1 mA and stepwise increase to 2 mA with a frequency of 3 Hz. The electrostimulation and the facial and neck movements were video recorded simultaneously and evaluated independently by two investigators. Results A uniform functional allocation of specific peripheral FN branches to a specific mimic movement was not possible. Stimulation of the whole spectrum of branches of the temporofacial division could lead to eye closure (orbicularis oculi muscle function). Stimulation of the spectrum of nerve branches of the cervicofacial division could lead to reactions in the midface (nasal and zygomatic muscles) as well as around the mouth (orbicularis oris and depressor anguli oris muscle function). Frontal and eye region were exclusively supplied by the temporofacial division. The region of the mouth and the neck was exclusively supplied by the cervicofacial division. Nose and zygomatic region were mainly supplied by the temporofacial division, but some patients had also nerve branches of the cervicofacial division functionally supplying the nasal and zygomatic region. Conclusions FN branches distal to temporofacial and cervicofacial division are not necessarily covered by common facial nerve monitoring. Future bionic devices will need a patient‐specific evaluation to stimulate the correct peripheral nerve branches to trigger distinct muscle functions. Level of Evidence 4 Laryngoscope , 127:1288–1295, 2017