Premium
Objective assessment of Myringotomy and tympanostomy tube insertion: A prospective single‐blinded validation study
Author(s) -
Schwartz Joseph,
Costescu Adrian,
Mascarella Marco A.,
Young Meredith E.,
Husein Murad,
Agrawal Sumit,
Roth Kathryn,
Doyle Philip C.,
Nguyen Lily H. P.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.25746
Subject(s) - myringotomy , medicine , blinded study , tympanostomy tube , surgery , prospective cohort study , otitis
Objectives/Hypothesis Despite the transition to competency‐based education in surgery, few standardized assessment tools exist in otolaryngology training. In particular, myringotomy and tympanostomy tube insertion (M+T) is a common surgical procedure with few validated assessment tools available. Our objectives were to develop an objective structured assessment of operative skills in M+T and to provide validity evidence for the developed assessment tool within otolaryngology training. Study Design Prospective study involving the evaluation of an assessment tool. Methods Through consultation with a panel of experts in otolaryngology and medical education we developed a Task‐Specific Checklist and Global Rating Scale for M+T. Postgraduate year 2 junior residents, postgraduate year 3 senior residents, and attending otolaryngologists were video recorded performing M+T at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. The videos were subsequently reviewed and independently evaluated by three blinded raters from an unaffiliated academic institution. Results The average score of junior residents, senior residents, and attending otolaryngologists using the Task‐Specific Checklist was 21.7/30 (±7.1), 26.3/30 (±3.5), and 27.3/30 (±6.2), respectively ( P = .04). For the Global Rating Scale, the scores for junior residents, senior residents, and attending surgeons were 27.7/50 (±11.2), 34.5/50 (±9.5), and 45.1/50 (±4.6), respectively ( P < .001). The inter‐rater and intrarater reliability were both above 0.88. Conclusions The Task‐Specific Checklist and Global Rating Scale for M+T appear reliable, with validity evidence supporting their use in otolaryngology training. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:2140–2146, 2016