z-logo
Premium
Using Lean Thinking at an otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic to improve quality of care
Author(s) -
van LeijenZeelenberg Janneke E.,
Brunings Jan Wouter,
Houkes Inge,
van Raak Arno J. A.,
Ruwaard Dirk,
Vrijhoef Hubertus J. M.,
Kremer Bernd
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.25741
Subject(s) - otorhinolaryngology , medicine , outpatient clinic , quality (philosophy) , surgery , philosophy , epistemology
Objectives/Hypothesis Although Lean Thinking has led to considerable improvement in a variety of healthcare settings, its effects on otorhinolaryngology remain underexposed. This study reports on how the implementation of Lean Thinking at an otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic has affected patient and provider satisfaction, waste reduction, and organizational culture. Study Design Prospective before‐and‐after design. Methods The 18‐month prospective before‐and‐after design used mixed methods for data collection and analysis. A survey was conducted to measure satisfaction among patients and providers. Semistructured interviews were conducted to evaluate the effect of Lean Thinking on waste and organizational culture. Results During the project, 69 issues were posted on the Lean board. Improvements were made on 36 inefficiency issues, not all concerning a specific type of waste. Employees reported considerable improvement in transportation, motion, and waiting. Patient satisfaction was high both at baseline and follow‐up and did not change significantly. The effects on provider satisfaction were slight; satisfaction with autonomy and participation decreased significantly, but satisfaction with communication increased significantly. Conclusions The implementation of Lean Thinking at an otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic reduced waste and increased provider satisfaction with communication. Although patient satisfaction did not change significantly, it cannot be concluded that the intervention had no effect on perceived quality of care. Other approaches to measure patients' perceptions should be considered. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 126:839–846, 2016

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here