Premium
What is the best modality to minimize bacterial contamination of nasal saline irrigation bottles?
Author(s) -
Shargorodsky Josef,
Lane Andrew P.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.25129
Subject(s) - saline , contamination , irrigation , medicine , nasal lavage , nostril , bottle , nasal cavity , therapeutic irrigation , chronic rhinosinusitis , surgery , human decontamination , anesthesia , nose , agronomy , pathology , biology , ecology , mechanical engineering , engineering
BACKGROUND Nasal saline irrigation is a common component of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) management. The benefits of irrigation have been noted in primary and postoperative management of CRS. The irrigation consists of physiologic saline solution applied into a nostril via a squeeze-bottle, a bulb syringe, or a neti pot. As the saline flows through the nasal cavity from anterior to posterior, then into the nasopharynx and contralateral nasal cavity, it washes out mucus and potential irritants. The efficacy of nasal saline irrigation has been demonstrated, with improvement shown in the endoscopic appearance as well as symptom scores in CRS patients. However, it has recently been shown that a large proportion of irrigation bottles have evidence of bacterial contamination. A link between irrigation bottle contamination and clinical infection has not been established; however, there is significant concern for infectious transmission, especially in the postoperative setting. Given the potential for the contaminated fluid to contribute to sinonasal infections, several approaches have been evaluated in an attempt decrease the bacterial presence within the irrigation bottles, and subsequently the irrigation fluid.