z-logo
Premium
Laryngotracheal reconstruction: A ten‐year review of risk factors for decannulation failure
Author(s) -
Tawfik Kareem O.,
Houlton Jeffrey J.,
Compton William,
Ying Jun,
Khosla Siddarth M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.24963
Subject(s) - medicine , intensive care medicine , surgery
Objectives/Hypothesis To determine risk factors for decannulation failure after laryngotracheal reconstruction performed at a single institution over a 10‐year period. Study Design This is a retrospective cohort study. Methods The study population included 95 adult patients who underwent laryngotracheal reconstruction at a single tertiary care medical center between 2003 and 2012. Data were retrospectively reviewed. Results Our cohort consisted of 95 subjects (60% female) with a median (range) age of 48 (21–82) years. Fourteen patients failed to decannulate by one postoperative year and were more likely to have diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, grade 4 stenosis, T‐tube requirement, secondary tracheotomy, double‐stage reconstruction, and more endoscopic dilations within the first postoperative year. T‐tube requirement was highly predictive of decannulation failure, with an odds ratio of 50.6 in univariate analysis and 93.7 in multivariate analysis. Grade 4 stenosis and a requirement of at least one postoperative endoscopic dilation were also found significant under both univariate and multivariate models. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was marginally significant under the univariate and multivariate models ( P  = .059 and .088, respectively). Conclusions The presence of preoperative and postoperative factors may indicate a higher risk of decannulation failure after laryngotracheal reconstruction. Patients with diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and grade 4 stenosis are at higher risk for decannulation failure. Requirement of T‐tube placement and requirement of endoscopic dilation are predictive of decannulation failure. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope , 125:674–679, 2015

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here