Improving applicant selection: Identifying qualities of the unsuccessful otolaryngology resident
Author(s) -
Badran Karam W.,
Kelley Kanwar,
Conderman Christian,
Mahboubi Hossein,
Armstrong William B.,
Bhandarkar Naveen D.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.24860
Subject(s) - otorhinolaryngology , medicine , graduation (instrument) , specialty , family medicine , psychiatry , geometry , mathematics
Objectives/Hypothesis To identify the prevalence and management of problematic residents. Additionally, we hope to identify the factors associated with successful remediation of unsuccessful otolaryngology residents. Study Design Self‐reported Internet and paper‐based survey. Methods An anonymous survey was distributed to 152 current and former program directors (PDs) in 2012. The factors associated with unsuccessful otolaryngology residents and those associated with the successful remediation of problematic residents were investigated. An unsuccessful resident is defined as one who quit or was removed from the program for any reason, or one whose actions resulted in criminal action or citation against their medical license after graduation from residency. Remediation is defined as an individualized program implemented to correct documented weaknesses. Results The overall response rate was 26% (40 PDs). Seventy‐three unsuccessful or problematic residents were identified. Sixty‐six problematic or unsuccessful residents were identified during residency, with 58 of 66 (88%) undergoing remediation. Thirty‐one (47%) residents did not graduate. The most commonly identified factors of an unsuccessful resident were: change in specialty (21.5%), interpersonal and communication skills with health professionals (13.9%), and clinical judgment (10.1%). Characteristics of those residents who underwent successful remediation include: poor performance on in‐training examination (17%, P < .01) and inefficient use of time (11.4%, P = .02). Conclusions A large proportion of otolaryngology PDs in this sample identified at least one unsuccessful resident. Improved methods of applicant screening may assist in optimizing otolaryngology resident selection. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope , 125:842–847, 2015
Discover
Journals
Proceedings
Books
Explore
Engineering & Computer Science
Health & Medical Sciences
Humanities, Literature & Arts
Life Sciences & Earth Sciences
Physics & Mathematics
Social Sciences
Chemical & Material Sciences
Business, Economics & Management