z-logo
Premium
Cisplatin otoprotection using transtympanic L‐N‐acetylcysteine: A pilot randomized study in head and neck cancer patients
Author(s) -
Yoo John,
Hamilton Scott J.,
Angel Douglas,
Fung Kevin,
Franklin Jason,
Parnes Lorne S.,
Lewis Denise,
Venkatesan Varagur,
Winquist Eric
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.24360
Subject(s) - medicine , ototoxicity , head and neck cancer , acetylcysteine , cisplatin , chemotherapy , adverse effect , hearing loss , randomized controlled trial , anesthesia , clinical trial , prospective cohort study , surgery , cancer , audiology , biochemistry , chemistry , antioxidant
Objectives/Hypothesis To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of transtympanic L‐N‐Acetylcysteine (L‐NAC) administration in patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy for head and neck cancer. Study Design Prospective randomized nonblinded open‐label clinical trial. Methods Transtympanic 2% L‐NAC was administered to one randomly selected ear with the other ear as control in each patient. Primary outcome parameter was the difference in the loss of pure tone averages (PTA) at 2, 4, and 8 kHz between the L‐NAC and control ear at 1 to 2 months following chemotherapy. Results Eleven patients completed the study, with two patients demonstrating significantly better hearing in the L‐NAC treated ear (18.2%). However, for the overall group, the difference in hearing preservation did not reach significance. Two percent L‐NAC administration was well tolerated in this patient population. There were no adverse effects associated with L‐NAC. Conclusion Although the study did not demonstrate a significant benefit overall, transtympanic L‐NAC was associated with significantly better hearing in two patients. Better delivery methods may improve the efficacy of this treatment. L‐NAC remains a promising drug in preventing cisplatin‐induced ototoxicity. Level of Evidence 1b. Laryngoscope , 124:E87–E94, 2014

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here