z-logo
Premium
Which inferior turbinate reduction technique best decreases nasal obstruction?
Author(s) -
Larrabee Yuna C.,
Kacker Ashutosh
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.24182
Subject(s) - medicine , turbinectomy , surgery , turbinates , muscle hypertrophy , cryotherapy , nose
BACKGROUND Chronic nasal obstruction can significantly impair patients’ quality of life and is a frequent complaint seen by otolaryngologists. Inferior turbinate hypertrophy is a common cause of chronic nasal obstruction. Various etiologies for the hypertrophy of inferior turbinates include allergic reactions, nonallergic rhinitis, chronic hypertrophic rhinitis, and compensatory hypertrophy as seen in septal deviation. Conservative medical treatment options include topical decongestants and corticosteroids, antihistamines, systemic decongestants, mast cell stabilizers, and immunotherapy. However, in patients who have failed medical management, surgical reduction of the inferior turbinates is an effective treatment. Many surgical techniques exist to reduce the size of the inferior turbinates. Conventional surgical options include partial or total turbinectomy, turbinoplasty, electrocautery, cryotherapy, laser cautery, submucosal resection, and submucosal resection with lateral displacement. Newer techniques include radiofrequency-assisted turbinoplasty, microdebrider-assisted turbinoplasty, and ultrasound turbinate reduction. There is no consensus as to which surgical technique is most effective in decreasing nasal obstruction.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here