Premium
Laryngotracheal transplantation
Author(s) -
Farwell D. Gregory,
Birchall Martin A.,
Macchiarini Paolo,
Luu Quang C.,
Mattos Angelo M.,
Gallay Brian J.,
Perez Richard V.,
Grow Matthew P.,
Ramsamooj Rajen,
Salgado Moses D.,
Brodie Hilary A.,
Belafsky Peter C.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.24053
Subject(s) - medicine , immunosuppression , transplantation , laryngotracheal stenosis , larynx , surgery , airway , pancreas transplantation , reinnervation , organ transplantation , tracheotomy , rehabilitation , anastomosis , microsurgery , kidney transplantation , intensive care medicine , tracheal stenosis , physical therapy
Objectives/Hypothesis Laryngeal transplantation offers the potential for patients without a larynx to recover their voice, which is critical in our communication age. We report clinical and functional outcomes from a laryngotracheal transplant. Widespread adoption of this technique has been slowed due to the ethical concerns of life‐long immunosuppression after a nonvital organ transplant. Our patient was already on immunosuppressive medication from prior kidney–pancreas transplantation, and therefore was not exposed to added long‐term risk. We describe the unique technical advances, clinical course, and rehabilitation of this patient and the implications for future laryngeal transplantation. Study Design Case report. Methods A laryngotracheal transplantation was performed in a 51‐year‐old prior kidney–pancreas transplant recipient presenting with complete laryngotracheal stenosis. Surgical modifications were made in the previously described technique related to retrieval, vascular supply, and reinnervation. This resulted in a robustly vascularized organ with well‐perfused long‐segment tracheal transplant and early return of motor reinnervation. Results A multidisciplinary approach resulted in a successful transplant without evidence of rejection to date. Postoperatively, the patient continues to rely on a tracheotomy but has had the return of an oral and nasal airway, vocalization, smell, and taste, all experienced for the first time in 11 years. Conclusions We have demonstrated that our methods may result in a successful laryngotracheal transplant. We describe the preparation, surgical technique, rehabilitation, and interventions employed in achieving optimal outcomes. This report contributes valuable information on this rarely performed composite transplant. Laryngoscope , 123:2502–2508, 2013