z-logo
Premium
The impact of radiotherapy on facial nerve repair
Author(s) -
Gidley Paul W.,
Herrera Stephanie J.,
Hanasono Matthew M.,
Yu Peirong,
Skoracki Roman,
Roberts Dianna B.,
Weber Randal S.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
the laryngoscope
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.181
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1531-4995
pISSN - 0023-852X
DOI - 10.1002/lary.21048
Subject(s) - medicine , facial nerve , radiation therapy , surgery , facial paralysis
Objective: To study the impact of radiotherapy on the success of primary facial nerve repair and cable nerve grafts. Study Design: Retrospective review. Methods: Pre‐ and postoperative facial nerve function were assessed using the House‐Brackmann (HB) grading system. Results: Thirty‐nine patients were identified who had undergone facial nerve repair: 5 patients (13%) underwent primary repair, and 34 patients (87%) underwent nerve grafting. Radiotherapy was administered postoperatively to 34 patients (87%). Preoperative HB scores were I = 18, II = 11, III = 3, IV = 3, V = 3, and VI = 1. Postoperative scores were HB I = 1, II = 4, III = 16, IV = 6, V = 3, and VI = 9. Only patients with single‐branch deficits recovered to HB I or II function. Good facial function (HB I–III) was achieved in 17 of 34 patients (50%) who received postoperative radiotherapy compared to 4 of 5 patients (80%) who did not receive postoperative radiotherapy ( P = .349). Among the patients who had either HB I or II function preoperatively, 59% achieved good postoperative function (HB I–III). Four out of 10 patients (40%) with significantly compromised preoperative facial function (HB III–VI) were able to achieve HB III function. Conclusions: Postoperative radiotherapy appears not to prevent achieving good facial function after a nerve repair, especially when normal or near‐normal function is present preoperatively. Some patients with fair to little function preoperatively can achieve reasonable postoperative function with facial nerve reconstruction. Laryngoscope, 2010

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here