z-logo
Premium
Branching ratio of the C 2 H 2 + O reaction at 290 K from kinetic modelling of relative methylene concentration versus time profiles in C 2 H 2 /O/H systems
Author(s) -
Peeters Jozef,
Boullart Werner,
Langhans Ivan
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
international journal of chemical kinetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.341
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1097-4601
pISSN - 0538-8066
DOI - 10.1002/kin.550260902
Subject(s) - chemistry , methylene , branching fraction , analytical chemistry (journal) , reaction rate constant , kinetic energy , yield (engineering) , branching (polymer chemistry) , kinetics , atomic physics , thermodynamics , medicinal chemistry , organic chemistry , physics , quantum mechanics
In earlier work on the room temperature oxidation of C 2 H 2 by O atoms, two distinct sources of methylene radicals have been identified: (i) direct, primary production via channel 1b of the C 2 H 2 + O reaction, and (ii) delayed formation via the secondary reaction 3 involving the products HCCO and H of the other primary channel 1a:Presently, it was confirmed by a detailed sensitivity analysis that the precise shapes of the resulting total methylene concentration‐versus‐time profiles in C 2 H 2 /O systems depend strongly on the k 1a / k 1b branching ratio. Along that line, the important parameter k 1a / k 1b was determined from relative CH 2 concentration‐versus‐time profiles measured in a variety of C 2 H 2 /O/H systems using Discharge Flow‐Molecular Beam sampling Mass Spectrometry techniques (DF‐MBMS). The data analysis was carried out by deductive kinetic modelling; the method, as applied to profile shapes, is discussed at length. Via this novel, independent approach, the CH 2 ( 3 B 1 ) yield of the two‐channel C 2 H 2 + O reaction was determined to be k 1b / k 1 = 0.17 ± 0.08. The indicated 2σ error includes possible systematic errors due to uncertainties in the rate constants of other reactions that influence the shapes of the CH 2 profiles. The present result, which translates to an HCCO yield k 1a / k 1 = 0.83 ± 0.08, is in excellent agreement with other recent determinations. The above mechanism, with the subsequent reactions that it initiates, also reproduces the measured absolute [C 2 H 2 ], [O], and [H] profiles with an average accuracy of 5%, thus validating the consistency of the C 2 H 2 /O/H reaction model put forward here. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom